Time series and forecasting · insight-1222
Replay intermittent-demand forecasts through a stock policy and report service and stock, not only error
- Evidence type
- practitioner heuristic
- Difficulty
- hard
- Roles
- Data scientist, Data analyst
- Industries
- retail, manufacturing, logistics
Summary: situation, action, reason, boundary
Situation
Spare-parts demand is mostly zeros with occasional orders, and two methods tie on MASE.
Action
Simulate an order-up-to rule driven by each method's predictive quantile over the lead time on the backtest history. Report fill rate, stock-out events and average stock held, and compare at equal service.
Reason
Inventory outcomes depend on the distribution of lead-time demand, so a decision replay measures what the metric cannot.
Boundary
Slow movers and intermittent series feeding stock or capacity decisions.
Symptom or risk
Point-error metrics reward forecasts near zero and do not show stock-outs or excess; equal error can mean very different service and inventory.
Exceptions
If no stock decision follows (reporting only), distribution scores are enough.
Trade-offs
A replay needs cost and lead-time assumptions and a policy; results are conditional on them.
Pitfalls
Replaying with actual demand known at ordering time.
Lessons and concepts
Claims and their sources
Kolassa argues that MAD, MASE and wMAPE are inherently unsuitable for count data and recommends evaluating entire discrete predictive distributions with proper scoring rules.