Skip to content
ML Academy

Statistics, experimentation, causal reasoning · insight-0005

Name one primary metric and correct for multiplicity across the rest of the scorecard

Evidence type
documented fact
Difficulty
medium
Roles
Data scientist, Data analyst
Industries
cross-industry

Summary: situation, action, reason, boundary

  1. Situation

    An experiment scorecard shows 20 or more metrics and the readout highlights whichever ones moved.

  2. Action

    Pre-register one primary decision metric and a small set of guardrails. Treat other metrics as diagnostics; when you must claim effects on many, control the false discovery rate (Benjamini-Hochberg) or the family-wise rate (Bonferroni or Holm).

  3. Reason

    The 5% error rate applies per test. Picking winners after the fact turns many honest tests into one dishonest claim.

  4. Boundary

    Experiment scorecards, segment breakdowns, metric screens and model comparisons on one test set.

Symptom or risk

With 20 independent metrics at the 5% level, the chance of at least one false "win" is about 64% even when nothing changed.

Exceptions

Exploratory analysis meant to generate hypotheses, labelled as such and followed by a confirmatory test.

Trade-offs

Bonferroni protects strongly but loses power; FDR control keeps more power and accepts that a known share of claimed discoveries are false.

Pitfalls

Applying a correction to the metrics you report while silently dropping the ones you looked at.

Lessons and concepts

Claims and their sources