Statistics, experimentation, causal reasoning · insight-0005
Name one primary metric and correct for multiplicity across the rest of the scorecard
- Evidence type
- documented fact
- Difficulty
- medium
- Roles
- Data scientist, Data analyst
- Industries
- cross-industry
Summary: situation, action, reason, boundary
Situation
An experiment scorecard shows 20 or more metrics and the readout highlights whichever ones moved.
Action
Pre-register one primary decision metric and a small set of guardrails. Treat other metrics as diagnostics; when you must claim effects on many, control the false discovery rate (Benjamini-Hochberg) or the family-wise rate (Bonferroni or Holm).
Reason
The 5% error rate applies per test. Picking winners after the fact turns many honest tests into one dishonest claim.
Boundary
Experiment scorecards, segment breakdowns, metric screens and model comparisons on one test set.
Symptom or risk
With 20 independent metrics at the 5% level, the chance of at least one false "win" is about 64% even when nothing changed.
Exceptions
Exploratory analysis meant to generate hypotheses, labelled as such and followed by a confirmatory test.
Trade-offs
Bonferroni protects strongly but loses power; FDR control keeps more power and accepts that a known share of claimed discoveries are false.
Pitfalls
Applying a correction to the metrics you report while silently dropping the ones you looked at.
Lessons and concepts
Claims and their sources
The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure controls the expected proportion of false rejections (the false discovery rate) for independent test statistics.