Skip to content
ML Academy

LLMs, GenAI, RAG, agents, evaluation · insight-1548

Add hard-negative passages to RAG tests, such as the superseded rule or the neighbouring route

Evidence type
empirical finding
Difficulty
medium
Roles
Applied AI, Data scientist
Industries
aviation, insurance

Summary: situation, action, reason, boundary

  1. Situation

    RAG tests give the generator only the gold passage plus unrelated filler, and the system passes, then fails in production on look-alike text.

  2. Action

    For each test question add near-miss passages from the same corpus: the previous version of the rule, the neighbouring route or product, a similar exception, and score whether the answer follows the right one.

  3. Reason

    Research on RAG context composition finds that top-ranked documents related to the query but containing no answer hurt accuracy, which random documents did not.

  4. Boundary

    Corpora with versions, near-duplicate policies or parallel product lines.

Symptom or risk

Related passages that do not answer the question mislead the generator, but random filler never exercises that failure.

Exceptions

Corpora with little overlap between documents, where near-misses are rare.

Trade-offs

Building near-miss cases takes domain knowledge and curation.

Pitfalls

Concluding from the random-document result that noise is harmless; it was specific to the setup studied.

Lessons and concepts

Claims and their sources