Statistics, experimentation, causal reasoning · insight-0029
Curate a small, relevant donor pool for synthetic control instead of including every available unit
- Evidence type
- documented fact
- Difficulty
- hard
- Roles
- Data scientist
- Industries
- aviation, retail, public-sector
Summary: situation, action, reason, boundary
Situation
A synthetic control for one route uses all 200 other routes as donors and only 12 months of pre-period data.
Action
Keep donors that are structurally similar and unaffected by the intervention or spillovers, document exclusions before estimation, and check that results survive leaving out each major donor.
Reason
The risk of over-fitting grows with the donor pool when the pre-period is short, and dissimilar donors can create interpolation bias even with a close fit.
Boundary
Market-level, route-level or regional evaluations with many potential comparison units.
Symptom or risk
With many donors and a short history, weights can fit pre-period noise, producing a near-perfect fit and an unreliable counterfactual.
Exceptions
Long pre-periods and genuinely homogeneous donors reduce the cost of a larger pool.
Trade-offs
A smaller pool may fit less tightly; it is easier to defend.
Pitfalls
Including donors that absorb the treated unit's lost demand, which inflates the estimated effect.
Lessons and concepts
Claims and their sources
Over-fitting risk increases with donor pool size, especially with few pre-intervention periods; donor units must be chosen judiciously, and dissimilar donors can cause interpolation bias.