Statistics, experimentation, causal reasoning · insight-0020
Ask what removed units from the data before analysing the survivors
- Evidence type
- practitioner heuristic
- Difficulty
- medium
- Roles
- Data analyst, Data scientist
- Industries
- aviation, finance, retail
Summary: situation, action, reason, boundary
Situation
An analysis of "routes we still operate" or "customers active today" is used to judge which strategies work.
Action
Rebuild the population as it existed at the start of the period, including units that later closed, churned or were cancelled. Compare outcomes from that starting cohort, and state the exit rule explicitly when only survivors are available.
Reason
Selection on the outcome changes the distribution being studied; the starting cohort restores the comparison the decision needs.
Boundary
Route profitability, customer lifetime value, fund performance, product line reviews and model training sets built from current entities.
Symptom or risk
Units that failed were dropped, so the surviving set looks healthier and any trait common among survivors looks like a success factor.
Exceptions
Questions explicitly about survivors, such as "how do active customers use feature X", are valid on survivors if labelled.
Trade-offs
Reconstructing history needs snapshot or SCD data and more effort than querying current tables.
Pitfalls
Joining to a current dimension table that silently drops closed routes or deleted accounts.
Example
Hypothetical: routes launched in 2022 and dropped in 2023 vanish from a "current routes" join, inflating average launch performance.